Tom Waterhouse – Change is a gamble.
Now I am not a betting man and I am not defending Tom
Waterhouse, but I was very interested to watch the public backlash against
bookmaker Tom Waterhouse’s recent campaign to introduce his gambling
services to TV sport. When his ads first appeared on TV I was very impressed
with how he got his message across and how complete the campaign was. He
pitched himself as one of us – he didn’t know how they hit a six, or how they
took those big marks, or made those crunching tackles, but he knew what Aussies
wanted – to bet on sport.
Gambling seemed fresh and non-threatening. It was
something even the kiddies could enjoy. And he was everywhere. It didn’t matter
what sport we watched, there he was with new and innovative ways of betting. He
would even give you back your money if you got some things wrong! Gambling must
be fun. How could it be harmful in any way?
However, in a matter of a few short months it had become one
of the biggest political issues in the country. The Prime Minister got involved
and legislation was soon being drafted to stop Tom Waterhouse in his tracks. What went wrong? Change Management – that’s what went wrong. Or at least that’s
what Tom Waterhouse did not do.
He was changing the way people watched sport
and interacted with gambling, and changing it in a big way. Tom Waterhouse
was engaged in transformational change and he got it wrong. There are some
lessons in this for us as business and information and management professionals.
How do you accomplish transformational change and win the support of your
One of the main things Tom Waterhouse had to get right
and any transformational leader must do is to build trust. What is trust? One
good definition is that trust is the disposition of a person to make themselves
vulnerable to another person without the expectation of being exploited.
Associate Professor Ken Dovey of UTS says, “Trust combines an emotional
expectation with a cognitive assessment about the predictability and
reliability of another’s behaviour. Trust is mental model about how a
particular relationship will work”. It is a basic human concept that must exist
for effective collaboration and collaboration is how we get things done in an
enterprise. By collaborating we transform creativity and learning into innovation.
That is, we make change happen.
It seems also that as humans we are wired for trust in a
biological sense. Professor Michael Kosfeld, in the Business Administration
faculty at Frankfurt University, conducted experiments that showed when people interact
the human brain releases oxytocin, which is a hormone that stimulates trust. In
other words we want to trust each other in our work places. Professor Kosfeld
says that “when trust is absent, we are, in a sense, dehumanised”.
|Taken from a footy punters' forum|
So, how can we build trust? Firstly, we need to identify the
stakeholders, the people we want to come on the journey of change with us. We
especially need to find those people who have the trust of others already.
Secondly, we need to honour the rules of the organisation
and its culture. Obviously, that includes the law itself, but there are also
conventions and accepted rules of behaviour that should be followed.
Thirdly, respect should be shown for those who have
different opinions and may not even agree with the change. If respect is shown
to them, then respect can be won also. Accept that not everyone will agree with
the change, however showing respect for those people will help to ensure that
they do not work against the change and they may even support it because they have
at least been shown respect and allowed to voice their concerns.
Finally, where there is conflict, be prepared to reconcile
with those people, so as to break down barriers and to not isolate people.
Remember that sometimes people react badly to change often out of genuinely
good motives, such as, concern for the direction of the enterprise or for the
welfare of colleagues. Perhaps they have reacted out of fear. Viewing these
reactions as opportunities to find constructive criticism and address concerns
that may be more widely held can turn negative reactions into increased
confidence in the leadership. This in turn can lead to stronger bonds of trust.
Of course, there are many other things a transformational
leader needs to pay attention to, however the building of trust is possibly the
most important. Once trust is built then old ways of doing things can be
challenged and new innovative practices can be introduced to our organisations.
Leaders can then drive change by providing a vision that is based on the shared
beliefs and values of members of the organisation.
Can Tom Waterhouse accomplish the same? It might be hard
as he is dealing with the Australian sport viewing public, in effect, a very
large and complex enterprise. He has already challenged the perceived rules of
behaviour and borne the brunt of the reaction of breaking those rules and not
building trust in the first place.
I’m not a betting man, but it will be interesting to watch
as this story evolves.
* Article has been edited 22/08/2013 - Names were edited from Robbie to Tom Waterhouse to correct the original title and body copy errors. ala "Fine Cotton"
If you like this article, share it!
Comment, please leave us your thoughts.
Tim is a senior business and information architect with wide experience in the
private and public sector. His private sector experience is almost
entirely in the finance sector, including Bankers Trust, Commonwealth
Bank, Sydney Futures Exchange, Commercial Union (now part of CGU), and
National Mutual Life Assocation (now Axa). His public sector experience
has been with NSW Police Force, Police Integrity Commission, Australian
Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), and Australian Taxation
Office (ATO). Tim has completed the ITMP program at UTS - Master of
Business (IT Management) with special focus on research into enterprise
Labels: bookmaker, Change Management, dehumanised, Gai Waterhouse, gambling, parliament, Professor Kosfeld, punters, Robbie Waterhouse, Television, Tom Waterhouse, transformational change, trust, UTS